Tuning Methods

Harmonic Series Tunings

Composites Only

Each tuning comprises twelve consecutive composites. Only odd composites are considered due to the assumption of octave equivalence (any even number is regarded as an octave transposition of the odd number obtained by removing all powers of two from it). If you don't assume octave equivalence, your set of composite-only tunings would look very different from these, and you would consider these to be odd-composite-only tunings in distinction from simple composite-only tunings.

 
CompositesLargest
Step
Smallest
Step
Prime
Limit
Odd
Limit
Harmonic
Complexity
9-55165 c32 c175528.7
15-57187 c32 c194925.8
21-63187 c32 c195527.5
25-65248 c26 c196335.6
27-69248 c25 c236533.1
33-75248 c25 c236533.7
35-77248 c22 c236932.3
39-81182 c22 c237735.0
45-85173 c46 c237730.7
49-87206 c40 c298742.6
51-91198 c40 c299137.7
 

A tuning can only be properly evaluated by ear in a particular musical context with respect to its purpose in that context. Nevertheless, I find it interesting sometimes to compare the numerical characteristics of a set of tunings generated according to the same scheme. The chart below shows that tuning 45-85 stands out as having a surprisingly low harmonic complexity and low contrast between step sizes compared to its neighbors, even though its prime and odd limits no lower. The greatest contrast in step sizes is in the middle set of tunings, rather than at one end as might be expected.


2005 by David J. Finnamore
tuning@elvenminstrel.com